Role-based awareness
Short learning formats for product management, development, support, procurement, sales and leadership.
Product security and incident reporting
Practise responding to a CRA incident.
An unfamiliar administrator account appears at two customers. Does your team know what to do next?
In the CRA cyber drill, product, security and support teams practise preserving evidence, coordinating protective measures and escalating the case to the responsible roles. Identify which handovers and reporting steps need further preparation.
Where Paragamix can support.
CRA implementation is not only a technical-documentation project. People need to recognize their role and follow the agreed process.
Process exercises
Guided scenarios for vulnerability intake, escalation, severe incidents, customer communication and recovery decisions.
Documentation aids
Practical templates for responsibilities, awareness evidence and internal workflows that complement the technical compliance file.
An update becomes a serious security incident.
Inside the CRA Mission
The scene connects remote triage, escalation and CRA reporting paths.
Reporting obligations have applied since 11 September 2026.
Read CRA requirements and sources
Who should assess CRA scope?
The CRA generally concerns hardware and software products with digital elements made available on the EU market. Final products and separately marketed components can be covered.
Manufacturers
Own core product requirements, cybersecurity risk assessment, technical documentation, conformity assessment, CE marking and vulnerability handling.
Importers and distributors
Must verify relevant conformity information and act when they know or have reason to believe that a product is not compliant.
Product and security teams
Development, PSIRT, support, procurement, legal, compliance and management need coordinated responsibilities and evidence.
Six CRA readiness areas.
- Scope and role: map products, components, economic operators, exceptions and regulatory overlaps.
- Secure product development: translate Annex I requirements into design, development, production and release controls.
- Cybersecurity risk assessment: document risks, security assumptions, intended use and proportionate measures.
- Vulnerability handling: maintain intake, triage, remediation, coordinated disclosure, updates and support-period processes.
- Reporting: prepare 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification and final-report workflows for reportable cases.
- Conformity evidence: align technical documentation, user information, conformity assessment and CE-marking decisions.
Reporting starts before full application.
Since 11 September 2026, manufacturers have been required to report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents affecting product security through the CRA Single Reporting Platform.
Processes should support an early warning within 24 hours, the main notification within 72 hours and the applicable final report. Classification, escalation, evidence preservation and communication therefore need to work before an incident occurs.
Official sources and status.
Status: 13 September 2026. Use the official text and current European Commission implementation guidance for decisions.
Clear boundary.
Paragamix awareness and process support does not constitute legal advice, product certification, a notified-body conformity assessment or confirmation of CRA compliance. Product scope and conformity decisions should be validated by the responsible legal and technical specialists.
Training questions.
Does the CRA apply only to products developed in the EU?
No. The relevant question is generally whether a covered product with digital elements is made available on the EU market, not only where it was developed.
Is a cloud service automatically a CRA product?
Not necessarily. The CRA focuses on products with digital elements and certain remote data-processing solutions related to a product. Stand-alone services and overlaps with other EU rules require a specific assessment.
Is awareness sufficient for CRA compliance?
No. Awareness supports implementation. The manufacturer still needs product-security controls, risk assessment, vulnerability handling, technical documentation, conformity assessment and other applicable obligations.